Responding to Comments
In a perfect world this would have been posted last week, but I know you all understand the demands of a busy schedule. First, I want to thank Mike Payne, Drew Loika and Cat Clarke for their positive responses to this blog. Your encouragement is very meaningful to me.
I was, however, concerned about Civilgrl’s comment. The word “bitter” really jumped out at me. We all have the opportunity to choose our attitudes and reactions to each situation we encounter. The reality is that the university mission is inclusive of all of our programs. My solemn promise to you is that engineering is not, and will not, be phased out.
A Development Council was formed with representation from all departments. The University Advancement office is motivated and engaged like never before. Fundraising is ongoing for all segments of campus, and I truly appreciate the dedication of our students who are out seeking financial and in-kind gifts to improve their learning experiences. The most visible fundraising is for the Center for Health Professions. No program is valued more than another in my opinion. The entire campus is better for the diversity in programs. As a microbiologist, I’ve done professional work with both engineers (wastewater treatment) and health/medical professionals.
Concerning Civilgrl’s comment about the lack of lavatories in the Civil Engineering wing of Cornett, I asked Facilities Services Director David Ebsen about this. There are restrooms at the front of the building and on the east side, near the anatomy and physiology laboratories.
David said, “There are no current plans to add additional restroom facilities. The fixture count for the building is in compliance with the occupancy load. Additional facilities will be required if and when the west side of the building is renovated.”
There is not a great deal of money available for deferred maintenance and renovation. Another reality is technology is expensive. The amount OIT receives from the state to offset costs is reduced every biennium. We do our best and hope that our students know and appreciate the value of the educational experience offered here.
I was, however, concerned about Civilgrl’s comment. The word “bitter” really jumped out at me. We all have the opportunity to choose our attitudes and reactions to each situation we encounter. The reality is that the university mission is inclusive of all of our programs. My solemn promise to you is that engineering is not, and will not, be phased out.
A Development Council was formed with representation from all departments. The University Advancement office is motivated and engaged like never before. Fundraising is ongoing for all segments of campus, and I truly appreciate the dedication of our students who are out seeking financial and in-kind gifts to improve their learning experiences. The most visible fundraising is for the Center for Health Professions. No program is valued more than another in my opinion. The entire campus is better for the diversity in programs. As a microbiologist, I’ve done professional work with both engineers (wastewater treatment) and health/medical professionals.
Concerning Civilgrl’s comment about the lack of lavatories in the Civil Engineering wing of Cornett, I asked Facilities Services Director David Ebsen about this. There are restrooms at the front of the building and on the east side, near the anatomy and physiology laboratories.
David said, “There are no current plans to add additional restroom facilities. The fixture count for the building is in compliance with the occupancy load. Additional facilities will be required if and when the west side of the building is renovated.”
There is not a great deal of money available for deferred maintenance and renovation. Another reality is technology is expensive. The amount OIT receives from the state to offset costs is reduced every biennium. We do our best and hope that our students know and appreciate the value of the educational experience offered here.
posted by VVL at 9:00 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home